<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back to Cloth for the Rest of &#8220;Diaper-hood&#8221; Thanks to Sweet Pea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.betterbabybits.com/2009/12/back-to-cloth-for-the-rest-of-diaper-hood-thanks-to-sweet-pea.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.betterbabybits.com/2009/12/back-to-cloth-for-the-rest-of-diaper-hood-thanks-to-sweet-pea.php</link>
	<description>Natural Baby Product Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:51:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Corina</title>
		<link>http://www.betterbabybits.com/2009/12/back-to-cloth-for-the-rest-of-diaper-hood-thanks-to-sweet-pea.php/comment-page-1#comment-774</link>
		<dc:creator>Corina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 02:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betterbabybits.com/?p=161#comment-774</guid>
		<description>We were sorry to say goodbye to these diapers as well!  We still think they&#039;re a great product but we&#039;ve run into some distribution difficulties.  We hope to offer an alternative in the near future but for the meantime we just have the one brand of cloth diapers, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.betterbabybums.ca/Sckoon-Organic-Cloth-Diapers-s/88.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Skoon Organics&lt;/a&gt;.  These are also a great choice, although they&#039;re a completely different style.  They are not a one-size-fits-all diaper and require a diaper cover to keep the wetness from seeping through.  I alternate between these, disposables and Sweet Pea diapers.  I bought a set of size large for my second and now my third fits into them brilliantly.  I imagine that when she starts potty-training I&#039;ll use these even more (they make great training pants!) like I did with my son.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We were sorry to say goodbye to these diapers as well!  We still think they&#8217;re a great product but we&#8217;ve run into some distribution difficulties.  We hope to offer an alternative in the near future but for the meantime we just have the one brand of cloth diapers, <a href="http://www.betterbabybums.ca/Sckoon-Organic-Cloth-Diapers-s/88.htm" rel="nofollow">Skoon Organics</a>.  These are also a great choice, although they&#8217;re a completely different style.  They are not a one-size-fits-all diaper and require a diaper cover to keep the wetness from seeping through.  I alternate between these, disposables and Sweet Pea diapers.  I bought a set of size large for my second and now my third fits into them brilliantly.  I imagine that when she starts potty-training I&#8217;ll use these even more (they make great training pants!) like I did with my son.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cristina</title>
		<link>http://www.betterbabybits.com/2009/12/back-to-cloth-for-the-rest-of-diaper-hood-thanks-to-sweet-pea.php/comment-page-1#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>cristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 05:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betterbabybits.com/?p=161#comment-771</guid>
		<description>just wondering why you no longer carry sweetpea diapers? I had purchased one from you guys to try out and fell in love with it but when I went to order in bulk they were pulled off your website. Do you no longer stand by the product? just curious to know if I should reconsider them for some reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just wondering why you no longer carry sweetpea diapers? I had purchased one from you guys to try out and fell in love with it but when I went to order in bulk they were pulled off your website. Do you no longer stand by the product? just curious to know if I should reconsider them for some reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
